Latter-day Saint Movie Review: How Does “The Lion King” Compare to the Original?
FEATURES
- A Country Doctor’s Healing Encounters with the Hereafter by Daniel C. Peterson
- Why the Fertile Crescent Matters: A Map That Unlocks the Bible’s Geography and History by Daniel C. Peterson
- Finishing Exodus, Furnishing a Home – Why Exodus Ends with Upholstery by Patrick D. Degn
- Where Did George Lucas Get His Idea? by Robert Starling
- The Stranger Who Stopped: The Good Samaritan by John Dye
- Hastening Now: A Weekly Church Report by Meridian Church Newswire
- “You Can Have What You Want or Something Better”–Come Follow Me Podcast #20: Num. 11-14, 20-24, 27 by Scot and Maurine Proctor
- Why Did Nephi Say Serpents Could Fly? by Scripture Central
- Miracles in the Waiting by Kellen B. Winslow
- How Has Retention Changed over Time? by Deseret News
-
Protecting Conscience Rights of Physicians
By Nicole Hayes and J.C. Bicek -
Currents: BYU Alums on “Shark Tank”; “Secret Lives…Orange County,” What Do Words Mean?; Young Men in Trouble—a Constant Theme
-
Is a Food Price Nightmare Coming?
-
The Cold Comfort of the Screen: Reclaiming Real Connection in a Digital Age
















Comments | Return to Story
ShereeJuly 25, 2019
While I agree this was amazing technology and thoughtful themes expressed this is not a kids movie. Stay with the earlier one for young children. It is very, very violent-more so than the original. Tender hearted little ones will likely have a hard time with this. This is so real that the violence is even worse. In the animated it was hard enough with Scar and Simba in slow motion. If you have children who deal with night mares this may not be for them.
Ron ClarkJuly 23, 2019
Sadly, this reviewer missed the beauty behind Lion King. It's her opinion, however, and she's entitled to it, but for the many we know, including ourselves, the Lion King rings with great drama, compassion, magnificent cinematography, and a level of computer-aided technique that transcends anything produced by Disney thus far. Audiences are proving the critics wrong. It's a must-see that touches the heart and rekindles the beauty of the original. The two art-forms were not meant to clash with each other. The new generation of film production in this case is a true compliment to the original. Take with a grain of salt the negatives. See the movie, sit back and enjoy the talent of gifted souls who labor long and hard to entertain us. Disney accomplished it and then some.
Ken HazelbakerJuly 23, 2019
You are too harsh - we loved the movie = absolutely enthralled with the realism of the technology We think they did a terrible disgrace to Elton John's circle of life The singer sounded amateur and shallow you left out a good thought about being the reflection of our father as he looked in the pool Having been to Africa on a safari hunt the realism of the animals was greatly appreciated - even to the syncopation of their individual gaits choreographed to the music. why can't you just sit back enjoy the movie for what it is instead of making such clinically detailed analysis? Like who cares who the actors are let's just enjoy the movie
ADD A COMMENT