What Did it Mean to be “King Over All the Land?”
FEATURES
- Unprecedented: A New Temple Square Visitors’ Center that Is Unlike Any Other by Scot and Maurine Proctor
- Holding Your Peace vs. Holding Your Ground on the Quest to Be Peacemakers by Mariah Proctor
- The Fire on the Altar: Emerson’s Longing and the Restoration’s Reply by Patrick D. Degn
- Parked on the Covenant Path by JeaNette Goates Smith
- Unraveling One Reason for Inactivity by Joni Hilton
- Currents: Church Trademark Lawsuit; Missionary Hero in Samoa; Ben Sasse on Dying and More by Meridian Magazine
- Hastening Now: A Weekly Church Report by Meridian Church Newswire
- My Mom Cared If She Got Mail by Daris Howard
- How Susceptible Are You to the Allure of Divergent Doctrine by Carol Rice
- The Physical Resurrection of Christ: Why Should Christian Theology Rely on Antiquated Views About Matter? by Jeff Lindsay
-
Currents: Church Trademark Lawsuit; Missionary Hero in Samoa; Ben Sasse on Dying and More
-
Eggshell Relationships: Walking Gently, Standing Firm
By Paul Bishop -
Becoming Brigham, Episode 13 — In spite of differences, what did Brigham Young and Emma Smith have in common deep in their souls?
-
The Physical Resurrection of Christ: Why Should Christian Theology Rely on Antiquated Views About Matter?
By Jeff Lindsay
















Comments | Return to Story
Ron BarnesJune 27, 2016
A similar system was used in North America. Many Indian groups that we consider to be tribes were actually nations consisting of many tribes. The Ilini Nation consisted of the Kaskaskia tribe (that I am descended from), the Peoria, Tapouaro, Coiracoentanon, Moingwena, Chinkoa, Maroa, Espeminkia, Cahokia, Chepoussa, and Omouahoa tribes. Each tribe had its own Chief while the Ilini Nation had a Chief who was over all of them. Other Indian nations were set up the same way. Some examples are the Apache, the Iroquois, and the Sioux. Sitting Bull was not just the Chief of one tribe, but Chief over all of the tribes that made up the Sioux Nation.
ADD A COMMENT