What Did it Mean to be “King Over All the Land?”
FEATURES
- The Part of Christ’s Sacrifice You Haven’t Considered by H. Wallace Goddard
- No Simple Slogans for Israel and Gaza by Gale Boyd
- The Proctors on a Mission #12—Gathering the Forces of Light by Scot and Maurine Proctor
- Inside Out Joy by Kathy K. Clayton
- A Special Edition Podcast: A Message of Faith and Hope from the Proctors by Scot and Maurine Proctor
- The First Presidency Announces New Voice for ‘Music & the Spoken Word’ by Meridian Church Newswire
- Relearning Touch After Betrayal by Geoff Steurer, MS, LMFT
- Come Follow Me Book of Mormon Podcast #13: “He Shall Rise … with Healing in His Wings,” Easter by Scot and Maurine Proctor
- Watch First Video From Final Season of “Book of Mormon Videos” by Larry Richman
- New Video Messages for Easter from Elder Andersen and Elder Christofferson by Meridian Magazine
Comments | Return to Story
Ron BarnesJune 27, 2016
A similar system was used in North America. Many Indian groups that we consider to be tribes were actually nations consisting of many tribes. The Ilini Nation consisted of the Kaskaskia tribe (that I am descended from), the Peoria, Tapouaro, Coiracoentanon, Moingwena, Chinkoa, Maroa, Espeminkia, Cahokia, Chepoussa, and Omouahoa tribes. Each tribe had its own Chief while the Ilini Nation had a Chief who was over all of them. Other Indian nations were set up the same way. Some examples are the Apache, the Iroquois, and the Sioux. Sitting Bull was not just the Chief of one tribe, but Chief over all of the tribes that made up the Sioux Nation.
ADD A COMMENT