The Death Of Two Parent Families? Or The Rights Of The Child?
FEATURES
- You Mormons Are Ignoramuses: Appreciating the Restoration Doctrine That Adam and Eve “Fell Up” by H. Craig Petersen
- Currents: Marie Osmond on Alan Osmond’s Death; Most of the Cast of “Secret Lives of Mormon Wives: Orange County” Are Not Members; Radical Left Podcaster Justifies Murder and Looting; and More by Meridian Magazine
- Shamar: What It Means to “Keep” the Commandments in Hebrew by Steve Densley, Jr.
- Why the Fertile Crescent Matters: A Map That Unlocks the Bible’s Geography and History by Daniel C. Peterson
- When Symbols Become Idols: Remembering What Points Us to Christ by Spencer Anderson
- Finishing Exodus, Furnishing a Home – Why Exodus Ends with Upholstery by Patrick D. Degn
- A Country Doctor’s Healing Encounters with the Hereafter by Daniel C. Peterson
- The Secret Life of Trees—and What It Teaches Us About Zion by Paul Bishop
- How Has Retention Changed over Time? by Deseret News
- Becoming Brigham, Episode 14 — The Prophet’s Shadow by The Interpreter Foundation
















Comments | Return to Story
Yvonne RussellFebruary 28, 2014
Passing the Parental Rights Amendment here on the US week go a long way to maintaining our sovereignty should the Convention on the Rights of the Child ever be afopted and ratified by our government. Bill Clinton was close to sending it to the Senate in 1995, so this has been a long time coming. You can learn more at parentalrights.org
Stephen JanickyjFebruary 28, 2014
I think this article is a little misleading. The US played an active role in drafting the UNCRC and though they have not ratified it (only two countries in the world have not ratified it) they have signed up to it. The UK government (which includes Scotland) signed and ratified the UNCRC in 1991. Because Scotland now has its own government as well as being part of the UK they have ratified it in their own right. As a parent in the UK I can reassure you it has caused no major issues and many welcome it as children throughout the world often don't enjoy the same rights they do here.
TimFebruary 27, 2014
Interesting article, and disappointing that the legislators in Scotland cannot see what seem to be self-evident truths demonstrated in this article. But I do take issue with the penultimate sentence. Surely, if a right can be taken away it is, by definition, not inalienable.
ADD A COMMENT