Sign up for Meridianās Free Newsletter, pleaseĀ CLICK HERE
QuestionĀ
I have a question, something I’ve pondered and thought about for a while and can’t come to a clear answer. What’s more important in a relationship, being in love, or loving someone? I’m in a relationship right now and it’s getting a little bumpy. This woman was married to an emotionally abusive man for years. She eventually left him, and, later we started dating. We love each other with all our hearts. We both agree that we love each other more than we could ever possibly love another human being. She is just struggling with the “in love” part. She says she has two jars, a “love” jar, and an “in love” jar. The “love” jar is overflowing, over 100% full. The “in love” jar, on the other hand, is 80% full. She’s really struggling with that, and is now finding herself tempted by “in love” situations with other men. So what’s more important?
Answer
It may seem like an odd distinction to put the word āloveā into separate categories, but I think your girlfriend is revealing something important about vulnerability in relationships. Essentially, sheās describing her struggle to let herself love and, in return, to be loved in a committed relationship.
Emotional, physical, and sexual abuse influences our emotions in profound ways. Our emotions guide us through the world by signaling us in subtle (and not so subtle) ways how we should respond to people and situations. Individuals who have been in abusive relationships learn to protect their hearts from getting hurt and can act in unpredictable ways when someone is getting emotionally close enough to hurt them.
This is why your girlfriend is making this separation between ālovingā and being āin love.ā The latter feels more comfortable to her, as itās based on infatuation and distance. Itās almost like a romantic crush. The other person stays a mystery and becomes more intriguing. Itās an important stage of relationship formation, but it eventually transitions into a more mature committed love.
She says that her love jar is full, but canāt fully be in love with you. I think sheās created this other jar to protect her from having to stay fully connected to you. Her heart is understandably terrified of getting injured again, so sheās going to create new criteria to distance her from that vulnerability.
Sheās allowed herself to feel close to you and began trusting you with her heart. Having been emotionally abused in the past, this is going to feel risky to her. It matters how she copes with these vulnerable feelings. She can surrender to the love youāre offering her and let herself love and be loved deeply, or she can keep looking for the thrill of infatuation with strangers.
Itās emotionally less risky to keep a relationship superficial and focus on romantic feelings. However, this wonāt produce the kind of love that will support a committed relationship through the inevitable ups and downs of long-term love. Elder Jeffrey R. Holland described it this way:
āNo serious courtship or engagement or marriage is worth the name if we do not fully investĀ allĀ that we have in it and in so doing trust ourselves totally to the one we love. You cannot succeed in love if you keep one foot out on the bank for safetyās sake. The very nature of the endeavor requires that you hold on to each other as tightly as you can and jump in the pool together. In that spiritā¦I want to impress upon you the vulnerability and delicacy of your partnerās future as it is placed in your hands for safekeepingāmale and female, it works both ways.ā[i]
She will continue to feel tempted by āin loveā feelings for other men until she fully allows herself to love and be loved by you. As Elder Holland described, this means she will allow her injured heart to be placed directly in your care by choosing to trust you. She can love from a distance and even have loving feelings for you, but it wonāt be a true committed relationship until she allows herself to believe that you have her back.
This is a good opportunity for you to initiate some discussions about her idea of emotional safety in a relationship. Gently ask her if she has a fear of vulnerability. Explore what is frightening to her about commitment. See if you can help her find her way through any of those questions. Also, ask if there are some concrete things you can do to be a safe harbor for her.
As she allows herself to be loved and connected to you, other opportunities will become less interesting to her. These other options only exist because she canāt quite allow herself to embrace the love youāre offering her. I hope she will give up some of her well-defended safety so she can experience the thrill of true attachment to another person.
Geoff will answer a new family and relationship question every Friday. You can email your question to him at ge***@lo************.com
About the Author
Geoff Steurer is a licensed marriage and family therapist in St. George, UT. He is the owner of Alliant Counseling and Education (www.alliantcounseling.com) and the founding director of LifeStar of St. George, an outpatient treatment program for couples and individuals impacted by pornography and sexual addiction (www.lifestarstgeorge.com). He is the co-author of āLove You, Hate the Porn: Healing a Relationship Damaged by Virtual Infidelityā, available at Deseret Book, and the audio series āStrengthening Recovery Through Strengthening Marriageā, available at www.marriage-recovery.com. He also writes a weekly relationship column for the St. George News (www.stgnews.com). He holds a bachelors degree from BYU in communications studies and a masterās degree in marriage and family therapy from Auburn University. He served a full-time mission to the Dominican Republic. He is married to Jody Young Steurer and they are the parents of four children.
You can connect with him at:
Website: www.lovingmarriage.com
Twitter: @geoffsteurer
Facebook: www.facebook.com/GeoffSteurerMFT
[i] https://speeches.byu.edu/talks/jeffrey-r-holland_how-do-i-love-thee/
MYGaleJune 16, 2017
It is also possible, in my female opinion, that in addition to the suggested issues, this woman is like so many who are captivated by the exciting images of the ideal romantic "love" that inundate popular media in all forms. No real man can compete with the idealized versions who promise to "sweep her off her feet". In reality, the men who have mastered this sort of "charm" are probably the same sort of cad she rejected already once, but she's having a hard time with the "chemistry" hoped for in spite of the intellectual reality of knowing she's found a good man....maybe just not a titillating one.
charliebrown2292June 16, 2017
The most brilliant explanation I ever read on the difference between "love" and "in love"...