Childlessness Falls, Family Size Grows Among Highly Educated Women
FEATURES
- You Mormons Are Ignoramuses: Appreciating the Restoration Doctrine That Adam and Eve “Fell Up” by H. Craig Petersen
- Currents: Marie Osmond on Alan Osmond’s Death; Most of the Cast of “Secret Lives of Mormon Wives: Orange County” Are Not Members; Radical Left Podcaster Justifies Murder and Looting; and More by Meridian Magazine
- Shamar: What It Means to “Keep” the Commandments in Hebrew by Steve Densley, Jr.
- Why the Fertile Crescent Matters: A Map That Unlocks the Bible’s Geography and History by Daniel C. Peterson
- When Symbols Become Idols: Remembering What Points Us to Christ by Spencer Anderson
- Finishing Exodus, Furnishing a Home – Why Exodus Ends with Upholstery by Patrick D. Degn
- A Country Doctor’s Healing Encounters with the Hereafter by Daniel C. Peterson
- The Secret Life of Trees—and What It Teaches Us About Zion by Paul Bishop
- How Has Retention Changed over Time? by Deseret News
- Becoming Brigham, Episode 14 — The Prophet’s Shadow by The Interpreter Foundation
















Comments | Return to Story
KateMay 8, 2015
Interesting that the "end of the childbearing years" is defined as 40-44. Two of my four children were born in those years--if I'd been polled at 41, I would have fit in their highly-educated-with-only-2-kids demographic. With the increase in women having children later than the typical 20s and 30s (especially highly educated women), plus the increased use of successful fertility treatments for older women, it seems that it would be wise to wait until age 50 before deeming a woman's childbearing years over--and for a few women, even 50 would be premature.
ADD A COMMENT