Church Issues Statement Opposing Proposed Utah Psychologist Licensing Act Rule
FEATURES
- Protecting the Symbols of Christ’s Church: How a Trademark Lawsuit Aligns with Prophetic Guidance by Steve Densley, Jr.
- The Fire on the Altar: Emerson’s Longing and the Restoration’s Reply by Patrick D. Degn
- Parked on the Covenant Path by JeaNette Goates Smith
- 746 Times: What a Word Cloud Revealed About the April 2026 General Conference by Patrick D. Degn
- Unraveling One Reason for Inactivity by Joni Hilton
- Currents: Church Trademark Lawsuit; Missionary Hero in Samoa; Ben Sasse on Dying and More by Meridian Magazine
- The Physical Resurrection of Christ: Why Should Christian Theology Rely on Antiquated Views About Matter? by Jeff Lindsay
- Hastening Now: A Weekly Church Report by Meridian Church Newswire
- How Susceptible Are You to the Allure of Divergent Doctrine by Carol Rice
- Eggshell Relationships: Walking Gently, Standing Firm by Paul Bishop
-
“What Is Required to See the Face of God?”—Come Follow Me Podcast: Exodus 19-20, 24, 31-34
-
Some Examples of Godly Parenting
-
Hope Does Not Die Here: Being Bathed in the Atonement of Christ
-
Currents: Tabernacle Choir Launches Broadcast into Africa; New Names for Young Women Age Groups; Secret Life of Mormon Husband
-
Protecting the Symbols of Christ’s Church: How a Trademark Lawsuit Aligns with Prophetic Guidance
















Comments | Return to Story
Norma J EntrekinOctober 18, 2019
I'm confused; What does the law /rule actually say? And why\is the Church opposed to changing it ? Details please- I second K Mc Clure above- Please explain in detail- Thanks
Mark SteeleOctober 18, 2019
The document raises some concerns about the proposed rule that should be given consideration before the rule is adopted. However, their request that the rule making process be taken out of the hands of professionals and given back to the legislators is a terrible idea and should be rejected. Let’s let the professionals complete their work and establish appropriate safety from damaging conversion therapies, which the church agrees should be eliminated.
LizOctober 16, 2019
I'm relieved to see the church take a stand for reasoned fairness. There are a pleura of counselors who are ready and willing to celebrate, encourage and even promote alternative life styles. There should be agency to choose a counselor who can give compassionate care for someone sho wants to consider other paths. Enough of the scare tactics - time for reason.
Judith H. RoseOctober 16, 2019
Thank goodness the Church is taking a stand against a rule that would seriously affect the efficacy of counselors in dealing with LGBTQ concerns. No psychologist should be limited in his or her counseling in this important area. Each has received specific and thorough investigation and education in how to meet the emotional needs of their clients. Lawmakers do not know more than these counselors. Furthermore, each client always maintains the right to accept or decline advice and/or treatment concerning this sensitive issue.
K. McClureOctober 16, 2019
So what is the proposed rule?
ADD A COMMENT