10 Things Science Cannot Prove
FEATURES
- Why the Fertile Crescent Matters: A Map That Unlocks the Bible’s Geography and History by Daniel C. Peterson
- A Country Doctor’s Healing Encounters with the Hereafter by Daniel C. Peterson
- Finishing Exodus, Furnishing a Home – Why Exodus Ends with Upholstery by Patrick D. Degn
- Where Did George Lucas Get His Idea? by Robert Starling
- The Stranger Who Stopped: The Good Samaritan by John Dye
- Hastening Now: A Weekly Church Report by Meridian Church Newswire
- “You Can Have What You Want or Something Better”–Come Follow Me Podcast #20: Num. 11-14, 20-24, 27 by Scot and Maurine Proctor
- How Has Retention Changed over Time? by Deseret News
- Miracles in the Waiting by Kellen B. Winslow
- Why Did Nephi Say Serpents Could Fly? by Scripture Central
















Comments | Return to Story
PopsMay 12, 2017
In my view, the underlying principle behind all of this is that everything we claim to know relies on stuff we can't know (axioms). It is because "we", or our minds, are not connected to the universe except through fallible senses. Thus arises the assertion that it is not possible to determine whether the universe really exists, or if I am simply a participant in an elaborate simulation in which my senses are provided input by some sufficiently-advanced computing device. Richard Feynman expressed it this way: "The best a scientist can ever say is 'I'm not wrong yet'."
HalMay 11, 2017
I always fall back on the reality that we are constantly finding out that past scientific "proof" are found to not be true after all. Scientists from 50 years ago based their hypotheses / theories / proofs on what they could observe with the instruments of their time and have since proven to be incomplete at best and down-right false in many cases. I personally expect that trend to continue. I would hope we can be humble enough to know that, just because something is unexplainable by us doesn't mean it's unexplainable.
ADD A COMMENT