Judges Gone Wild
FEATURES
- He Comes as Help: The Blessing Is His Presence by Patrick D. Degn
- There Are Angels Among Us by Anne Hinton Pratt
- Brigham Young’s 225th Birthday: Remembering When He Outwitted Mark Twain by Daniel C. Peterson
- Aliens and Latter-day Saint Theology by C.D. Cunningham
- Crossing Our Own Jordan by Paul Bishop
- A Mother Remembers: On Losing Confidence by Maurine Proctor
- Against Wind and Tide: Wilford Woodruff’s Call to the British Capital by Steven C. Wheelwright and Kristy Wheelwright Taylor
- The Invisible Ledger- Five Smooth Stones: Essays on Faith for Latter-Day Saints by Paul Bishop
- Are You Saying “Telephone Prayers”? by Ted Gibbons
- Nothing to Prove by JeaNette Goates Smith
















Comments | Return to Story
DavidFebruary 2, 2015
I also deplore the result. But what if the federal judge honestly feels bound by his or her careful reading of the prior rulings of the US Supreme Court to reach a different conclusion? Because we don't like the result does that authorize one to ignore the highest authority of the Supreme Court? Labels and name calling are not helpful here. I commend the thoughtful article found in the Utah Bar Journal by Justice Thomas R. Lee which can be found at: Views from the Bench Vol. 26 No. 6 Pg. 12 Utah Bar Journal December, 2013.
Harold RustFebruary 2, 2015
I stand firmly with the essence of this article about blatant abuse by federal judges of their very specific purpose and powers. I still do not understand how our country slid into the mold where a single federal judge can make a decision totally against the majority of citizens and totally unrelated to any constitutional issue. How federal judges ever usurped the power to make decisions about choice of life style is something I still don't understand. Thank you to Lynn Wardle and others who are willing to explain in clear and convincing words exactly what is happening.
ADD A COMMENT