Supporting the Idea of a Small Geography for the Action of the Book of Mormon
FEATURES
- Why Joseph Smith’s Visit with Martin Van Buren was the Most Important Trip of His Life by Maurine Proctor
- How does Polygamy Play Into God’s Law of Marriage? by Valerie M. Hudson
- Your Hardest Family Question: I have regrets about divorcing and remarrying by Geoff Steurer, MS, LMFT
- You and We: Chapter 1 – The Chosen (a Serialization of Jim Ferrell’s New Bestseller) by Jim Ferrell
- Elder Gérald Caussé Is Called to the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles by Meridian Church Newswire
- What President Christofferson learned as a young law clerk investigating Watergate by Deseret News
- To Those Who Stood Between Us and Danger: Honoring America’s Veterans by Scot and Maurine Proctor
- Podcast: Heaven, Law, and Love: Joseph Smith’s Astonishing Teachings on Eternity” Doctrine and Covenants 129-132 by Scot and Maurine Proctor
- Who is Gérald Caussé, Our New Apostle? by Public Square Staff
- Are You Dating a Gold Digger? by Jeff Teichert
















Comments | Return to Story
Ronald BarnesAugust 30, 2025
When working with partial facts, we use assumptions to help us supplement them. Every theory I have read has assumed that the land masses of the Americans have not changed over the past thousands of years. I believe that they have changed, even dramatically, over that time. To me, the narrative of the book does indicate a large area, but not as large as others assume. I base this partly on the geological history of the area. Also, the Indians did not regard distances as the obstacles that we do. The Illini would travel over 400 miles on foot to fight an enemy. Plains Indians would ride horses from Canada into Mexico on raiding parties. Plus, the writers of the Book of Mormon could only write about those populations in the areas where they resided. I’m sure there were populations, even among their own peoples, that they were not aware of.
Corey D.August 29, 2025
Ultimately the geographical areas of where the Book of Mormon took place are not the most important, it's the spiritual teachings that set it apart but it does make for interesting, albeit sometimes heated discussion. I myself have always been curious about Joseph Smith's comments (found in Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith) that Lehi and his family landed in Northern Chile, most LDS historians, archaeologists, etc., don't give that much credence. I served my mission in the southern part of Chile back in the 70's, I was serving in a city called Chillan, one evening we had stopped to visit a man who we had left a Book of Mormon with, we asked if he had read any of it and did he have any questions, he said he had started to read it and was intrigued that the Nephites claimed to have come from the Middle East (that was not the usual story at the time for who settled in the New World) but then told us an interesting story about some writings that had been discovered out in the cordillera (Andes) and what he knew or had been told they were arabic writings. I got transfered not long after that and never had a chance to check out the story or possibly go out and see them but have always remembered that incident.
ADD A COMMENT