The Joseph Smith Translation: Of Firstlings, Firstborn, Lot, and Lineage
FEATURES
- “Crawling Over, Under, or Around Section 132”: The Debate Over Joseph Smith and Polygamy by Daniel C. Peterson
- The Trojan Horse of AI by Marianna Richardson
- An Open Letter to the Mayor of Fairview, Texas by C.D. Cunningham
- Looking Upon the Serpent by Paul Bishop
- Stepping into Moses’ Shoes: Joshua’s Divine Commission by Daniel C. Peterson
- Fooling the Supercomputer (Part 1) by Daris Howard
- The Command to Forgive When Your Heart Is Wounded by Roger Connors
- Your Grand Connections Are Both Powerful and Tender by Mary Bell
- Food Storage on a Tight Budget: You Are Not Too Broke to Prepare food by Carolyn Nicolaysen
- New Video Offers Rare View Into Missionary Training Center by Meridian Church Newswire
















Comments | Return to Story
Alvin H. AndrewMarch 27, 2026
I just realized my footnote 1 read rlejst.com. It should be [email protected]. Answering David Cook: I'm sorry, I do not know the answer to that question.
David CookMarch 26, 2026
Is it possible that the origin story of the Moabites and Ammonites could have been a later invention by the Israelites to malign and discredit their longtime enemies?
Todd LillywhiteMarch 25, 2026
Thanks for this. I was especially piqued by this thought: "It is interesting to note that from Adam until Jesus Christ the firstborn son never inherited the covenantal birthright and patriarchal priesthood. This was generally because of their unworthiness or perhaps as we see in the case of Ishmael, they were not born to the first wife. Biblically it was always a younger son who obtained the covenantal priesthood birthright among whom were Abel, Seth, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, and others." Interestingly, I had noticed a pattern. But, didn't take it so far as to study and find such cinsistency. Very interesting indeed.
ADD A COMMENT