4 Potential Consequences of Passing the Equal Rights Amendment
FEATURES
- “Crawling Over, Under, or Around Section 132”: The Debate Over Joseph Smith and Polygamy by Daniel C. Peterson
- The Trojan Horse of AI by Marianna Richardson
- An Open Letter to the Mayor of Fairview, Texas by C.D. Cunningham
- Looking Upon the Serpent by Paul Bishop
- Stepping into Moses’ Shoes: Joshua’s Divine Commission by Daniel C. Peterson
- The Command to Forgive When Your Heart Is Wounded by Roger Connors
- Fooling the Supercomputer (Part 1) by Daris Howard
- Your Grand Connections Are Both Powerful and Tender by Mary Bell
- Food Storage on a Tight Budget: You Are Not Too Broke to Prepare food by Carolyn Nicolaysen
- New Video Offers Rare View Into Missionary Training Center by Meridian Church Newswire
















Comments | Return to Story
HalJanuary 21, 2020
I can't believe that there are still people who think it is constitutional to revive the Equal Rights Amendment. There is a 7-year limit to ratify amendments - period. Somehow people think that states can still ratify the ERA almost 40 years after the original legislation. No, they have to start the process all over again. Not that it matters, many of the hidden agendas of the ERA proponents have been covertly made into law one at a time either state by state or via Supreme Court rulings. Truly Satan is binding us with his flaxen cords and leading us carefully (ever so carefully) down to hell.
ADD A COMMENT