Why Were Scholars Originally Critical of the Book of Ether?
FEATURES
- “Crawling Over, Under, or Around Section 132”: The Debate Over Joseph Smith and Polygamy by Daniel C. Peterson
- The Trojan Horse of AI by Marianna Richardson
- An Open Letter to the Mayor of Fairview, Texas by C.D. Cunningham
- The Command to Forgive When Your Heart Is Wounded by Roger Connors
- Looking Upon the Serpent by Paul Bishop
- Stepping into Moses’ Shoes: Joshua’s Divine Commission by Daniel C. Peterson
- Fooling the Supercomputer (Part 1) by Daris Howard
- Your Grand Connections Are Both Powerful and Tender by Mary Bell
- Food Storage on a Tight Budget: You Are Not Too Broke to Prepare food by Carolyn Nicolaysen
- New Video Offers Rare View Into Missionary Training Center by Meridian Church Newswire
















Comments | Return to Story
Glenn BrittDecember 1, 2024
I liked your Chess analogy. Additionally, Jaredite culture exactly mirrors 15th and 16th century pirate culture. Anyone could challenge the captain at any time, and the victor would be captain and the vanquished would join the others swabbing the deck. And if there was a mutiny, they fought till one side submitted, and the victor's side leader would be captain. And those they wished to "Leave in captivity," they would just leave on land at Nassau or Tortuga. In fact, change the names to Blackbeard, Drake and others and their cities to ships and Ether reads as a good pirate novel.
ADD A COMMENT