First Presidency Letter Asks that Meetinghouse Foyer Artwork be More Christ-centered
FEATURES
-
The Significance of Praying In the Name of Jesus Christ
By Ted Gibbons -
Why Formal Disclosure Matters (Part 1)
-
The Bright and Morning Star Podcast: What Happens When the Lord Opens the Sixth Seal?
-
Your Imperfect Family Situation Can Be Perfected in Him
-
BYU team using wearable nanocomposite sensor and AI to create prescription-like system for chronic back pain
-
In honor of his 90th birthday, President Eyring shares lessons he’s learned from his wife, Prophets and 38 years of Church service
By Church News
Comments | Return to Story
BobMay 13, 2020
I have very mixed feelings about the "approved" paintings. We've seen them for years, in our meetinghouses and temple visitor's centers. My gripe is that the majority of them are not art at all, but merely illustrations. Look at the Harry Anderson paintings; there's nothing artistic about them. They don't demand a thing from the viewer. Static and evoking no depth of emotion, provoking no questions, providing no challenge. Contrast them with the Heinrich Hoffman painting "Christ and the Rich Young Man'", on the approved list. It's everything the Anderson paintings are not. Or anything from Carl Bloch. I might use an Anderson painting to illustrate a scripture story, but I'll take Hoffman, Bloch, or hundred others if I want to contemplate who the Savior is, what he did, and what it means.
JoanMay 12, 2020
It will be wonderful to have these paintings displayed to remind us of our Savior and the reason we come to worship, and to increase our reverence. The place where no paintings are displayed, is in our chapels. I am told that the reason for this is that nothing is to upstage the Sacrament Table. Partaking of the Sacrament each week is our sacred privilege so that we can renew our covenant of taking upon us His name, and recommitting ourselves to keeping His commandments.
ADD A COMMENT