Share

Invincible – A Formula that Works
By Orson Scott Card

Sports movies.  You know the formula.  They don’t have a chance!  Wait, some new person gets involved!  He doesn’t have a chance!  Wait, he does great and everything turns around and everybody is happy!

I just described everything from Bad News Bears to Invincible.

(But please don’t write to me with your list of exceptions.  A formula is no less a formula just because some films don’t follow it.)

Here’s the thing: We keep buying it, because that’s the story we want to hear.  And why do we want to hear it?  Because each audience member hopes it’ll turn out to be the story of his or her own life.

When the story is fictional, we don’t want the hero to win, we just want him to come very close and learn valuable life lessons (Rocky, Bad News Bears).

When the story is true, there better be some winning or we’re going to be ticked off that you wasted our time with a story that sucks.  (Either that or its an artier film, and the whole point is to offend audience expectations.  Try North Dallas Forty – which, by the way, I love.  But I think it follows the “learn valuable life lessons” formula anyway.)

So what makes Invincible the top money-making film on its second weekend, beating out new releases Crank and Wicker Man?  Why did my whole family and I really enjoy this film?

It certainly follows the formula.  Vince Papale, a 30-year-old Philadelphian who has hit rock bottom – his wife just left him and he has to borrow money from his dad to make the rent – is pushed by his football-loving friends to go to an open tryout that new Eagles coach Dick Vermeil is holding mostly as a publicity stunt.

Papale is the only walk-on to make it out of the tryouts and into the team practices, but of course everybody expects him to be cut before they actually play any games.

Only he keeps not getting cut.  Ba-da-bee, ba-da-bing.  True story, so we know how it ends, or can look it up if we care.

Why is this formula story so effective?

1.  The story felt true. “Based on a true story” often means that they’ve gone to town on phony “dilemmas” and increases of jeopardy and lots of melodramatic soul-searching and fake conflict.  Brad Gann’s delicate script keeps the conflicts low key, more like real life, where people try to be civilized.  The only violence is on the football field.  You feel, at the end, that it might have happened exactly like this.

2.  The characters seemed real.  People in this movie are usually pretty inarticulate, unable to say what they feel.  They sometimes say devastating things without meaning to (though sometimes they mean to, of course).  When people say bad things, the other person usually tries to cover his or her emotions and pretend it doesn’t hurt.  The result is that when we do get our emotional climaxes, they are usually triggered by very simple, small things – a few words, a look, a smile.
Well … and a touchdown, of course, but it is a sports movie.

3.  The acting is superb.  Mark Wahlberg as Papale is having a bit of a Dennis Quaid or Jeff Bridges career – doing superb work, but usually in nonflashy parts so he gets neither the huge paydays nor the Oscar nominations.  But we totally buy him in this role.  He looks like he could actually do the stuff the film shows him doing.

Greg Kinnear as Vermeil doesn’t coast on his cute smile – and in the scenes with his wife Carol (Paige Turco), they seem like they have been married a long time and have a good relationship.  That’s hard to bring off in a movie – it’s so much easier to show people who hate each other and chew the scenery to prove it.
Elizabeth Banks as Papale’s love interest (and future wife, Janet Cantrell), has been given a movie-stealing part and makes the most of it.  We always believe that the real woman might be exactly as Banks depicts her.
And the ensemble of actors – Papale’s father, his football playing friends, the bar owner who gives him work during hard times, the coaches and players – they often have very little screen time, just a few moments to convey something – but every moment counts.

4.  Which brings us to director Ericson Core.  He’s a cinematographer – this is his first feature film.  The fact that he’s a cinematographer shows – he knows what the camera can do, and he does it.  The fact that this is his first feature does not show.  Maybe the actors do such wonderful work because they happen to be talented and the director had nothing to do with it (that often happens); but the cast is so consistently real that I believe we’re seeing the stamp of a director who knows how to draw great performances from his actors.  Those directors are rare (and they don’t include, for instance, Woody Allen or George Lucas).  I’m looking forward to seeing what Core does next.

What can I say?  It’s a formula movie, but in such good hands, the formula works.  We got tears in our eyes in all the right places; we were filled with exultation at the end.  That’s what your eight bucks are for, isn’t it?


2006 Meridian Magazine.  All Rights Reserved.

Share