Competing Views of “Inclusivity” Over Wendy Nelson’s Commencement Address
FEATURES
- “Crawling Over, Under, or Around Section 132”: The Debate Over Joseph Smith and Polygamy by Daniel C. Peterson
- The Trojan Horse of AI by Marianna Richardson
- An Open Letter to the Mayor of Fairview, Texas by C.D. Cunningham
- The Command to Forgive When Your Heart Is Wounded by Roger Connors
- Looking Upon the Serpent by Paul Bishop
- Stepping into Moses’ Shoes: Joshua’s Divine Commission by Daniel C. Peterson
- Fooling the Supercomputer (Part 1) by Daris Howard
- Your Grand Connections Are Both Powerful and Tender by Mary Bell
- Food Storage on a Tight Budget: You Are Not Too Broke to Prepare food by Carolyn Nicolaysen
- New Video Offers Rare View Into Missionary Training Center by Meridian Church Newswire
















Comments | Return to Story
Loraine WhettenMay 21, 2021
In addition to Wendy Nelson, who would you invite to speak at UVU Campus? Just asking.
Linda WillisMay 13, 2021
It's unfortunate that Dr. Nelson was rejected for who she is rather than the content of her address. How ironic that a beautiful message on avoiding contention in our personal and public lives was not heard by those in need of it.
PatMay 13, 2021
Narrow minded people do not like anyone’s opinion except theirs. We can only get to know each other better if we listen to others. We DON’T have to always agree with them.
Michele BaerMay 13, 2021
Very well written. The calm discussion to appreciate all sides of differing views is the path to bring succes and happiness. Thank you for expressing this so eloquently.
Maureen GaleMay 13, 2021
That is the most compelling, cohesive, and persuasive article I've read in a long time. Let's be for shedding full light on each argument (or better stated, point of view) and see where it leads. Jesus never shied away from letting His truths be known, even when it led to martyrdom. He only stopped lovingly persuading when he knew no hearts would be softened.
HarrietMay 13, 2021
This is a well thought out perspective. Thank you for writing it. I agree with the article, we need to come back to the time when ideas can be freely expressed. It is amazing what we can learn from one another when we are willing.
Frank MerrillMay 13, 2021
Perhaps my life is too simple. If someone whose opinion I don't wish to hear is speaking at an event, I don't attend the event. Should I decide to attend the event anyway, perhaps in the interest of widening my horizon, my reaction to that event is purely my own and I have no responsibility or prerogative to express my own reaction to anyone else. Continuing that simplicity and exercising my agency, I may decide to watch another film or television program in the event I do not choose to view or hear any more of the event I had been viewing, but exercising that agency does not authorize me to express my decision to anyone else.
ADD A COMMENT