Sacrifices and Blessings

Plural marriage was an Abrahamic test. The Church’s essay on the topic begins, “Latter-day Saints believe that the marriage of one man and one woman is the Lord’s standing law of marriage. . . . By revelation, the Lord commanded Joseph Smith to institute the practice of plural marriage among Church members in the early 1840s. For more than half a century, plural marriage was practiced by some Latter-day Saints under the direction of the Church President.” The next line acknowledges, “Latter-day Saints do not understand all of God’s purposes in instituting, through His prophets, the practice of plural marriage.”[i]

That seems to be key to at least part of what the Lord accomplished through plural marriage. He did not explain it much more than to say that it would be Abrahamic in its wrenching test and in its promised blessings.[ii] The Lord left it at that and promised to explain more later.

Saints went forward with faith and uncertainty. While plural marriage was a poorly kept secret in Nauvoo in the 1840s, it was an open secret in Iowa Territory and Utah in the late 1840s and early 1850s. In August 1852, Brigham Young appointed a special conference to have the revelation in section 132 of the Doctrine and Covenants read publicly and apostle Orson Pratt give a lengthy defense of the practice of plural marriage. The secret was out.

More than 100 missionaries were sent all over the world with instructions to preach it. The practice of plural marriage was wildly unpopular in the United States and elsewhere. In 1862, in the midst of the Civil War, the United States Congress passed the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act, which was designed to punish the Church for plural marriage by confiscating its property. President Lincoln had bigger problems to deal with and chose not to enforce the law.

After the Union was reconstructed, Congress turned its attention back to the saints. With encouragement from the First Presidency, George Reynolds allowed himself to be convicted under the Morrill Act to test its constitutionality. Though the First Amendment to the United States Constitution stipulates that Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion, the Supreme Court upheld the Morrill Act in 1879, ruling that a person is free to believe in plural marriage, but is not free to exercise that belief.

Latter-day Saints generally responded with civil disobedience because, when it came to a choice between the two, obeying a revelation seemed to them better than obeying a bad law. Congress, meanwhile, passed tougher and tougher laws against the saints, the Supreme Court upheld them, and federal marshals enforced them.

When President Dallin H. Oaks testified before a Congressional committee he stated, “I know of no other major religious group in America that has endured anything comparable to the officially sanctioned persecution that was imposed upon members of my church by federal, state, and local government officials. . . . Most of these denials of religious freedom received the express approval of the United States Supreme Court. It was a dark chapter in the history of religious freedom in this country.”[iii]

One Woman’s Test

In 1880, Lorena Washburn married Bent Larsen as a second wife. It was not her ideal arrangement. Most women in her time and place did not think of marriage as an ideal. They thought of it as an obligation and a protection. They expected it to be a lot of hard work, child rearing, and duty. And Latter-day Saint women expected it to end in exaltation.

Lorena wrote: “we had gone into that order of marriage because we fully believed God had commanded it, and while we had human nature to contend with, we worked and prayed for strength to overcome selfishness and greed and live on a higher plain, learn to love each other, or there would never be happiness.”[iv]

Lorena had ended one engagement at the age of 16 to an impatient 19-year-old beau, and turned down six plural marriage proposals, before she chose to marry Bent Larsen at the age of 20. She believed him to be “a thoroughly religious, straightforward and splendid man,” and consented to be his second wife after a foretelling dream and encouragement from his wife Julianna.[v]

Bent had already served five months in the state penitentiary for practicing polygamy in 1888 so, in 1889, after a “raid” on her family and others by federal marshals, Lorena left home to work in the Manti Temple so her husband would not be returned to prison. When she discovered she was expecting a baby, she and Bent moved their family to rural Colorado to avoid prosecution.

The Manifesto

Meanwhile, in his May 19, 1890 journal entry, President Wilford Woodruff noted: “The Supreme Court of the United States Decided to day Against the Church of Jesus Christ of latter Day Saints. They Decided to Escheat all the Church Property Real & Personal.” That meant that for the first time, all the teeth of the Morrill Act (and other laws subsequently passed) would bite. The federal government now threatened to confiscate the temples. President Woodruff worried continually about the wisest course to take.

Wilford Woodruff’s September 25, 1890 journal entry

In late September 1890 he wrote in his journal: “I have arived at a point in the History of my life as the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints whare I am under the necessity of acting for the Temporal Salvation of the Church. The United State Government has taken a Stand & passed Laws to destroy the Latter day Saints upon the Subject of poligamy or Patriarchal order of Marriage. And after praying to the Lord & feeling inspird by his spirit I have issued the following Proclamation which is sustained by My Councillors and the 12 Apostles . . . .”

About two weeks later at the Church’s October 1890 General Conference, President Lorenzo Snow presented a refined version of that document—the Manifesto, as he called it—to the saints for a sustaining vote. Some abstained, unsettled by the announcement and resentful of the government measures that led President Woodruff to seek the revelation, but those who voted supported the prophet’s inspired decision.

At the conclusion of the Conference session, the counsel to the saints was “go unto God yourselves, if you are tried over this and cannot see its purpose; go to your secret chambers and ask God and plead with Him, in the name of Jesus, to give you a testimony as He has given it to us, and I promise you that you will not come away empty nor dissatisfied; you will have a testimony, and a light will be poured out upon you, and you will see things that perhaps you cannot see and understand at the present time.”[vi]

The Light of Revelation

Lorena Larsen learned of the Manifesto near Moab, Utah on her way home from Colorado. She wrote vividly about the experience:

My husband came to our tent and told me about it, and my feelings were past description. I had gone into that order of marriage solely . . . because I believed God had commanded his people to do so, and it had been such a sacrifice to enter it, and live it as I thought God wanted me to. And as I thought about it, it seemed impossible that the Lord would go back on a principal which had caused so much sacrifice, heartache, and trial before one could conquer one’s carnal self, and live on that higher plane, and love one’s neighbor as one’s self. My husband walked out without saying a word, and as he walked away I thought, Oh yes, it is easy for you, you can go home to your other family and be happy with her, while I must be like Hagar, sent away.

My anguish was inexpressible, and a dense darkness took hold of my mind. I thot that if the Lord and the church authorities had gone back on that principle, there was nothing to any part of the gospel. I fancied I could see my self and my children, and many other splendid women and their families turned adrift, and our only purpose in entering it, had been to more fully serve the Lord. I sank down on our bedding and wished in my anguish that the earth would open and take me and my children in. The darkness seemed impenetrable.

All at once I heard a voice and felt a most powerful presence. The voice said, ‘Why this is no more unreasonable than the requirement the Lord made of Abraham when he commanded him to offer up his son Isaac, and when the Lord sees that you are willing to obey in all things the trial shall be removed.’

There was a light whose brightness cannot be described which filled my soul, and I was so filled with joy, peace, and happiness that I felt that no matter whatever should come to me in all my future life, I could never feel sad again. If the people of the whole world had been gathered together trying with all their power to comfort me, they could not compare with the powerful unseen Presence which came to me on that occasion.

And as soon as my husband came back I told him what a glorious presence had been there, and what I had heard. He said, ‘I knew that I could not say a word to comfort you, so I went to a patch of willows, and asked the Lord to send a comforter.’[vii]

Through the promised personal revelations, like the ones Lorena received, Latter-day Saints learned to accept plural marriage in the 1840s and to let it go beginning in the 1890s. There have been many significant and difficult changes in the Church throughout its history. In a world where everything including Church practices is subject to change, revelation to prophets and ordinary people remains constant. As Lorena learned in a dark hour, the love of God for each of His children is also constant and the way to cope well with change is to live in the light of personal revelations that confirm the eternal truths revealed by the Lord to His prophets.

Steven C. Harper, PhD is the Executive Editor of the Wilford Woodruff Papers.

Steve is a professor of Church history and doctrine at Brigham Young University. After graduating from BYU with a BA in history, he earned an MA in American history from Utah State University, and a PhD in early American history from Lehigh University. He began teaching at BYU Hawaii in 2000, then joined the faculty at BYU in 2002, and taught at the BYU Jerusalem Center in 2011–2012. He became a volume editor of The Joseph Smith Papers and the document editor for BYU Studies in 2002. In 2012 Steve was appointed as the managing historian and a general editor of Saints: The Story of the Church of Jesus Christ in the Latter Days, and was named editor in chief of BYU Studies Quarterly in 2018. He has authored numerous books and dozens of articles including Making Sense of the Doctrine and Covenants (2008), Joseph Smith’s First Vision (2012), and First Vision: Memory and Mormon Origins (2019).

Discover more from Wilford Woodruff’s eyewitness account at

Learn more about the Wilford Woodruff Papers Project by watching this short video.

To contribute your talents to this historic project please visit our volunteer page.


[ii] Doctrine and Covenants 132:29-37.

[iii] Reported in “Elder Oaks Testifies Before U.S. Congressional Subcommittee,” Ensign (July 1992), 78-80.

[iv] Autobiography of Lorena Eugenia Washburn Larsen, 61.

[v] Larsen, Lorena Eugenia Washburn. Autobiography of Lorena Eugenia Washburn Larsen. Published by her children. [Provo, UT]: Brigham Young University Press, 1962, 36.

[vi] “General Conference,” Latter-Day Saints Millennial Star 52:47, (November 24, 1890), 738.

[vii] Autobiography of Lorena Eugenia Washburn Larsen, 107.