The Textual Development of D&C 130:22 and the Embodiment of the Holy Ghost
FEATURES
- Whistling in the Dark by Terry Bohle Montague
- How the Missionaries Escaped through Closed Borders by Terry Bohle Montague
- When You Want to Help But You Don’t Know How by Lynne Perry Christofferson
- Our Gospel is NOT as Good as His by H. Wallace Goddard
- Between Sacred Bonds: Understanding Sexuality Through the Lens of Eternity by Brianna Holmes
- Q&A with my Imaginary Angel by Shalissa Lindsay
- Our Food Supply: Where Do We Stand? by Carolyn Nicolaysen
- A Small Gesture, Remembered Forever by Mariah Proctor
- Putting on a Positive Spin by Daris Howard
- ‘Be peaceful; be happy,’ President Holland says in Orem, Utah by Church News
Comments | Return to Story
Claudette RaylSeptember 17, 2013
To a person who has been baptized in fire and baptized in the personage of the Holy Ghost (baptize means to immerse completely), Joseph Smith's statement that the Holy Ghost dwells "in us" is perfectly understandable. When one actually experiences the immersion in the person of the Holy Ghost, and feels his spirit body inside one's physical body, healing and cleansing every atom, one KNOWS beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Holy Ghost is a real personage of spirit and that he has a tangible body made of spirit matter. I guess the confusion comes from people who have never had this heavenly experience. To feel the Holy Ghost lift you up and cradle you in his arms, and perform healings internally in your body, and to have him be your personal Comforter and guide, is to know that he can actually dwell in you.
Michael L.September 16, 2013
Why get so hung up on this? Is modern physics the final word? After all, modern physics proved the world was flat. Any man of science knew that. Its interesting to note that alternative physic theories can elegantly explain discrepancies the author professes. Tangible matter is an observation on our part. In reality, tangible matter is in a state of constant flux. To greatly oversimplify it, matter fluxuates between a state of matter as we know it and "anti-matter." We can only observe the tangible matter side of the equation. To me there is no discrepancy.
Mike TroutSeptember 16, 2013
This article is a teaser and then it takes you to a pay site where to must pay to read the rest. I hope this is not a theme to come on Meridian Magazine as that would not be welcome.
ADD A COMMENT