Astrophysicists (e.g., Paul Davies) acknowledge that the likelihood that a "life friendly" universe such as ours could randomly pop into existence would be infinitesimally small. The only theory that scientists can come up with to avoid the conclusion that there must be an "intelligent creator" is the Multiverse Theory, which postulates that ours is simply one of an infinite number of universes. This theory itself, however, requires one to accept a number of very strange concepts -- including the notion that it is most likely that we are all just part of some gigantic computer program. So the next time Richard Dawkins or some other scientist insists that religion is just silly mythology, you can be sure that they simply do not understand how bizarre and preposterous science has to get in order to explain away God.
Comments | Return to Story
David DurfeeOctober 19, 2020
Astrophysicists (e.g., Paul Davies) acknowledge that the likelihood that a "life friendly" universe such as ours could randomly pop into existence would be infinitesimally small. The only theory that scientists can come up with to avoid the conclusion that there must be an "intelligent creator" is the Multiverse Theory, which postulates that ours is simply one of an infinite number of universes. This theory itself, however, requires one to accept a number of very strange concepts -- including the notion that it is most likely that we are all just part of some gigantic computer program. So the next time Richard Dawkins or some other scientist insists that religion is just silly mythology, you can be sure that they simply do not understand how bizarre and preposterous science has to get in order to explain away God.
ADD A COMMENT